課程資訊
課程名稱
亞洲城市的全球化
GLOBALIZATION OF ASIAN CITIES 
開課學期
99-1 
授課對象
工學院  建築與城鄉研究所  
授課教師
黃麗玲 
課號
BP7102 
課程識別碼
544 M3990 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期三2,3,4(9:10~12:10) 
上課地點
工綜305 
備註
總人數上限:25人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

2005年,全球有一半的人口居住在都市中,而預計在2025年全球的都市人口將超過三分之二。在台灣,都市化程度已接近百分之八十。整體而言,亞洲國家,例如中國、越南、印度等,正是這一波全球化中都市化最為快速的國家。亞洲城市成為全球資本流動的熱區。全球化所帶來的時空壓縮、跨界生產與流動的現象,正在亞洲城市中加速進行。這些由跨界動力所催動的城市網絡間,既充滿競爭,又有不同層級的合作。然而,在亞洲國家尋求全球化路徑、創造經濟成長的耀眼表現下,隱藏著許多的社會與空間的矛盾:區域與階級的差異擴大、都市社會被政治衝突、宗教以及種族矛盾所分裂等。亞洲複雜的都市化過程與全球化模式,正是都市與區域研究的重要新興課題。

本課程安排主要分成兩個部分。第一個部分介紹亞洲城市空間再結構過程。我們將從全球化城市理論原型以及亞洲模式的論辯開始,接著進入子題如:城市競爭、城市擴張以及鉅型都市區域的興起、新的空間特性、新自由主義與社會不平等之議題等。我們討論的城市與區域包括亞洲中經濟先進發展國家日本、已分道揚鑣的前「東亞四小龍」經濟體、這一波全球化中崛起的中國大陸主要城市以及東南亞後進國家的主要城市。我們將檢視全球化城市中的同質化與異質化的面貌。同時我們也特別在課程中安排兩個星期討論台北,以增進對我們在地城市的瞭解。
課程的第二個主題聚焦於都市再發展、鉅型計畫、鉅型盛會之間的關係,並檢視其中弱勢群體的接近城市的權利課題。我們將討論地方政府如何透過意象工程與文化產業來進行城市轉型,以及地產發展所造成的仕紳化(gentrification)。其中,首爾的專題討論,將將從環境治理、文化旅遊以及數位城市等面向來討論首爾的意象轉變。最後,我們以外籍移工為例,來檢視全球化城市的過程中,空間與社會排除的相互強化,以及弱勢群體的抵抗策略。 

課程目標
1. 使學生掌握全球化的政治、經濟與文化邏輯、熟悉全球城市的主要概念
2. 使學生理解都市與區域空間生產模式的改變、進一步指認亞洲全球化城市的特性
3. 使學生能從比較的觀點,對東亞、中國大陸、東南亞等主要城市的全球化路徑的進行分析
 
課程要求
1. 準時上課。若您不能維持準時出席的守則,請不要選修這堂課。若您有特殊狀況不能出席或遲到,請於上課前通知課程助教。本課程歡迎旁聽。但請旁聽生遵守上課時間規定。
2. 本課程主要課程繁重,尤其以讀物以英文為主。請衡量修課時間與能力。
3. 每節上課兩天前繳交一頁A4讀書心得(reflection),email給課程助理。由課程助理整理後在上課前一天傳給所有修課學生。不收逾期作業。出席率、報告內容以及討論發言的參與很重要。佔期末總成績之40%。平時作業成績為總成績之30%。期末報告為總成績之30%。不收逾期報告,除非不可抗力原因。期末作業若有抄襲情況,學期成績將以不及格計。
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
備註: 星期四早上10:00-12:00或電話約定 
指定閱讀
課程大綱
Week 1 (9/15) 課程介紹
Week 2 (9/22) 中秋節停課
Week 3 (9/29) 理論原型: 從世界城市到全球城市
1. Friedmann, John, and Goetz Wolff. 1982. “World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (IJURR). 6(3):309-345. Reprinted in The Global Cities Reader. Neil Brenner and Roger Keil (eds.). London: Routledge. Pp 57-66.
2. Friedmann, John. 1986. “The World City Hypothesis.” Development and Chang, 17(1): 69-83. reprinted in The Global Cities Reader. Neil Brenner and Roger Keil (eds.). London: Routledge. Pp 67-71.
3. Sassen, Saskia. 2006. “Locating Cities on Global circuits.” Originally from Environment and Urbanization (2002), reprinted in The Global Cities Reader. Neil Brenner and Roger Keil (eds.). London: Routledge. Pp 89-95.

Week 4 (10/6) 全球化台北(一)
1. Wang, Jenn-Hwan. 2004. “World City Formation: Geopolitics and Local Political Process: Taipei’s Ambiguous Development.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (IJURR), Vol. 28.2. June 2004, 1-17.
2. Hsu, Jinn-yuh. 2005. “The Evolution of Economic Base: From Industrial City, Post-industrial City to Interface City.” In Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development. Edited by Reginald Y.W. Kwok. London: Routledge. pp17-35.
3. Ching, Chia-Ho. 2005, “The Development of Economic Structure: Producer Services and Growth Constrain.” In Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development. Edited by Reginald Y.W. Kwok. London: Routledge. Pp35-54.

Week 5 (10/13) 全球化台北(二)
1. Chou, Tsu-lung, 2005. “The Transformation of Spatial Structure: from a Mono-centric to a polycentric city.” In Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development. Edited by Reginald Y.W. Kwok. London: Routledge. Pp55-77.
2. Jou, Sue-Ching, 2005. “Domestic Politics in Urban Image Creation: Xinyi as the Manhattan of Taipei.” In Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development. Edited by Reginald Y.W. Kwok. London: Routledge. Pp120-140.
3. Huang, Liling. 2005. “Urban Politics and Spatial Development: the Emergence of Participatory Planning.” In Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development. Edited by Reginald Y.W. Kwok. London: Routledge. Pp78-98.

Week 6 (10/20) 「亞洲四小龍」、發展型國家與分歧策略
1. Hill, Richard Child and June Woo Kim. 2000. “Global Cities and Developmental States: New York, Tokyo and Seoul.” Urban Studies 37 (12) 2167-2195.
2. Douglass, Mike. 1994. “The ‘Developmental State’ and the Newly Industrialized Economies of Asia,” Environment and Planning A, 26(4) 543 – 566.
3. 王振寰,2002。東亞「世界城市」的不同路徑:漢城與台北。台灣社會研究季刊。第四十七期,頁 85-141。台北:唐山出版社。


Week 7 (10/27) 區域差異與新空間秩序
1. Smith, Neil. 2002, “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy.” Antipode. Pp. 427-450
2. McGee, T.G. 1991, “The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis.” In: N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel and T.G. McGee (eds). The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, Honolulu: U H Press. Pp3-25.
3. Douglass, Mike. 2000. “Mega-Urban Regions and World City Formation: Globalization, the Economic Crisis and Urban Policy Issues in Pacific Asia.” Urban Studies, (17):12. pp. 2317-2337.


Week 8 (11/3) 全球化與社會不均
1. Fainstein, Susan S. 2006. “Inequality in Global City Regions.” In Global City Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. edited by Allen J. Scott. New York: Oxford Press. 285-298.
2. Huang, Youqin, 2005. “From Work-unit Compounds to Gated Communities: Housing Inequality and residential segregation in transitional Beijing.” In Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space. Laurence J. C. Ma and Fulong Wu (eds). London: Routledge. Pp 192-221.
3. Tai, Po-Fen. 2005. “Social Polarization and Income Inequality: Migration and Urban Labor Market.” In Globalizing Taipei: The political Economy of Spatial Development. Edited by Reginald Yin-Wang Kwok. Pp141-166.


Week 9 (11/10) 中國城市的全球化策略
1. Ma, Laurence J. C. and Fulong Wu. 2005. “Chapter 1. Restructuring the Chinese City: Diverse Process and reconstituted spaces.” pp1-20, in Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space. Laurence J. C. Ma and Fulong Wu (eds). London: Routledge. pp1-20
2. Olds, Kris. 1997. “Globalizing Shanghai: the Global Intelligence Corp” and the Building of Pudong. Cities, 14 (2): 109-123
3. Wei, Albert and Wing Tai. 2006. Place Promotion and Iconography in Shanghai’s Xingtiandi. Habitat International (30) 245-260. Amsterdam: Elsevier.


Week10 (11/17) 期中考,停課一週。同學寫作期末報告提綱。
Week 11 (11/24) 新自由主義與金融危機
1. McGee T. G. 2002. “Restructuring the Southeast Asian City in an Era of Volatile Globalization.” Asian Journal of Social Science, 30:1, 8-27.
2. Kim, Wan Beo. 2001. “Re-positioning of City-Region: Korea after the Crisis.” in Global City Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, edited by Allen J. Scott. New York: Oxford Press. Pp 263-284.
3. Douglass, Mike. 2002. “From Global Intercity Competition to Cooperation for Livable Cities and Economic Resilience in Pacific Asia”, Environment and Urbanization. 14(1): pp 53-68..

Week 12 (12/1) 從殖民城市到新文化認同
1. King, Anthony D. 2006. “Building, Architecture, and the New International Division of Labor.” Originally from Urbanism, Colonialism and the World-Economy (1991). Reprint in The Global City Reader. Edited by Neil Brenner and Roger Keil. London: Routledge. Pp 196-202.
2. Shatkin, Gavin. 2006. “Colonial Capital, Modernist Capital, Global Capital: the changing political symbolism of urban space in Metro Manila, the Philippines.”
pp 89-118. In Capital Cities in Asia-Pacific: Primary and Diversity. K. C. Ho and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao (eds). Taipei: Center for Asia –Pacific Area Studies. RCHSS, Academic Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
3. Logan, William. 2006. “The Cultural Role of Capital Cities: Hanoi and Hue, Vietnam.” Pp 49-70. in Capital Cities in Asia-Pacific: Primacy and Diversity. K. C. Ho and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao (eds). Taipei: Center for Asia –Pacific Area Studies. RCHSS, Academic Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

Week 13 (12/8) 都市競爭與鉅型計畫
1. Olds, Kris. 2001. “Globalization and the Development of Pacific Rim Mega Projects.” in Globalization and Urban Changes: Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects. London: Oxford University. Pp 17-34.
2. Douglass, Mike and Liling Huang. 2007. “Globalizing the City in Southeast Asia: Utopia on the Urban Edge – the Case of Phu My Hung, Saigon.” The International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies. Electronic Journal, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
3. Marshall, Richard. 2002. The making of a Malaysian Capital: Putrajaya and the Multimedia Super Corridor. in Emerging Urbanity: Global Urban Projects in the Asia Pacific Rim. London: Spon Press. 169-190


Week 14 (12/19) 中山北路參訪
Week 15 (12/22) 首爾專題:都市再發展、品牌化與仕紳化
1. Cho, Myung-Rae, 2010. “The politics of urban nature restoration: The case of Cheonggyecheon restoration in Seoul, Korea”. International Development Planning Review, Vol. 32, No. 2., p. 145-65
2. Seong-Kyu Ha, 2004. Housing renewal and neighborhood change as a gentrification process in Seoul. Cities, Vol. 21, No. 5, p. 381–389, 2004
3. Townsend, Anthony M., 2007. “Seoul: birth of a broadband metropolis” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2007, Vol. 34, p. 396-413.

Week 16 (12/29) 文化盛會、都市行銷與意象工程學
1. Bradley, A., Hall, T., & Harrison, M. 2002, “Selling Cities: Promoting New Images for Meetings Tourism. Cities”, 19(1), 61-70.
2. Andranovich, G., Burbank, M. J. and Heying, C. H. (2001) Olympic Cities: Lessons Learned from Mega-Event Politics, Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(2): 113-131.
3. Masayuki Sasaki, 2010. “Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking, creative city theory through a Japanese case study.” Cities Vol. 27. S3–S9.

Week 17 (1/5) 國際移民、移工與接近城市的權利
1. Law, Lisa. 2002. “Defying Disappearance: Cosmopolitan Public Spaces in Hong Kong,” Urban Studies, 39(9):1625-1645.
2. Huang, Liling and Mike Douglass. 2009. “Foreign Workers and the Production of Community Space: Taipei’s Little Philippines.” Pp 51-71. In Amrita G. Daniere and Mike Douglass (eds.) Building Urban Communities, London: Routledge.
3. 王志弘,2006。「移�置認同與空間政治:桃園火車站週邊消費族裔地景研究」台灣社會研究季刊。第61卷,3月號。頁149-203。台北:唐山出版社。


Week 18 (1/12) 課程總結

 
參考書目
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/15  課程介紹 
第2週
9/22  中秋節停課 
第3週
9/29  理論原型: 從世界城市到全球城市 
第4週
10/06  全球化台北(一) 
第5週
10/13  全球化台北(二) 
第6週
10/20  「亞洲四小龍」、發展型國家與分歧策略 
第7週
10/27  區域差異與新空間秩序  
第8週
11/03  全球化與社會不均 
第9週
11/10  中國城市的全球化策略 
第10週
11/17  期中考,停課一週。同學寫作期末報告提綱 
第11週
11/24  新自由主義與金融危機 
第12週
12/01  從殖民城市到新文化認同 
第13週
12/08  都市競爭與鉅型計畫 
第14週
12/15  中山北路參訪 
第15週
12/22  首爾專題:都市再發展、品牌化與仕紳化 
第16週
12/29  文化盛會、都市行銷與意象工程學 
第17週
1/05  國際移民、移工與接近城市的權利